[Photo Galleries ][Polls Discussion ]
Posted by Melmac on April 27, 2003 at 18:43:26:
In Reply to: Re: Santorum: 'I have a problem with homosexual acts' posted by rpc on April 27, 2003 at 06:15:08:
"Santorum won't lose a single vote from his constituants"
I beg to differ with you, RPC. To make a statement like that says all the people of Pennsylvania agree with Santorum and that is patently false. The people of that state are not that ignorant.
"His statement was merely a paraphrase of the controlling Supreme Court decision writtten by Justice Potter some years ago
Law of the land? What are you talking about? Can you cite a single homosexual imprisoned for commission of homosexual acts? Just one, RPC.
Yes, RPC, some of our states do have antiquated laws against sodomy. Look up the definition of sodomy and you will probably discover yourself guilty of this "crime" too. Actually, don't bother, I did it for you:
RPC, the sodomy laws apply to heterosexuals too. It is governments way of telling us how we can and can't have sex. The laws are wrong and unjust.
So, if Santorum has had oral sex, "digital" sex, anal sex, or any 'non-coital' sex, in his monogomous relationship with his church going, god-fearing wife - they are guilty of sodomy, according to the laws of some states.
So, as Santorum links homosexual behaviour to bestiality and pedophilia, I will add that the laws cover heterosexuals as well and that he is probably guilty of the 'crime', he so dreads. (If he isn't, I pity him!)
Which raises the question - are you a sodomist too, without even knowing it?
Do you support laws that govern YOUR sexual behaviour?
Now, please explain how the "law of the land" applies only to homosexuals.