after having read to-days papers & considered both sides of the story i cant see any reason why the farmer should go free, fair enough the frog was about to steal/beat up some guy but that does not mean you take the law into your own hands because if he got away with it well what next, why didnt this farmer get a couple of alsation dogs to protect him, i also think the judge was wrong in saying he found it difficult to jail this guy, what message is he sending, []there is a law to protect them aswell as ordinary folk