In Reply to: re: better to be without him posted by Che G on February 11, 2010 at 18:41:55:

I don't think its about being against change. If you have read Daz's posts over time you'll know well he's not happy with a lot of the status quo.

Part of the problem is that people who have been good media manipulators rather than good decision makers have had undue power. How about politicians who care more about the country than their own personal ambition and wealth ? I know its a naive idea but to me, if George's ideas were so good, and if he cared about the country enough, he'd have stuck it out and used the media to get his point across. He didn't, he saw he had a challenge, he saw he had a nice safety net in Montrose, he jumped and left his constituents in the lurch.

Thats not the kind of politician I want.