Posted by NoOneShouldHaveItAll on November 13, 2000 at 13:40:26:
Bush if elected(if thats what U call it), would be very, very bad for world peace, or more correctly the security of the world outside the U.S.. The U.S. has treaties with Russia that bans either Giant from creating a missile sheild around their country. Bush has promised to re-launch Regans Starwars project. A U.S. citizen reading this may say why not, as it will not be an aggressive overture towars Russia but an act of defence. That argument is both flawed & wrong. The whole idea of the treaty was to ensure that both countries nuclear deterent was balanced, now if the U.S. becomes capable of Blasting Moscow, St.Petersberg, Volgograd, & every other Russian city, town, airbase, navybase, missile silo, armybase etc. of the face of the Earth & the worlds number two power can't even respond, then the Russians Nuclear deterent & that of every other nuclear power becomes usless against America. This would result in one country holding all the cards, calling all the shots, and can do anything it likes. Now dont get the wrong idea & think I approve of Nukes, I don't, I am totaly opposed, but if in my view it is wrong that some countries think they are intiteled to them & others are not. Some countries do have them, so we must face that reality, so their should be a balance. Russia is the counter weight to the U.S. surge for world dominanance. Now as it goes their could be worse countries that could be in that position, but there are just as many better countries to do the job(they would not deserve, that position either). The U.S. should stick to it's obligations, & so too should Russia, France, China, U.K. ETC. Bush is Bad cos he represents all that is bad with the American gun-toating mentality, remember he & the Florida goverener(his brother) both compete in the good old game of fry that bad boy,. yea haaaa, You all come back yee here.