Posted by W.G.A.T on February 15, 2001 at 17:32:20:

In Reply to: Re: Inaddmissable Proof posted by PJ on February 15, 2001 at 17:30:25:

Objection sustained !

Follow Ups:

• Re: Inaddmissable Proof Judge Judy 17:47:24 15/02/01 (11)
  • Poor taste -JEC Offended 21:00:38 15/02/01 (5)
    • Re: Poor taste -JEC Spartacus 03:37:04 16/02/01 (0)
    • Re: Poor taste -JEC Yep 21:36:57 15/02/01 (3)
      • Re: Poor taste -JEC Scrawny 12:08:31 16/02/01 (0)
      • Not particularly religious and detest censorship but Ian Paisley for pope 21:45:36 15/02/01 (1)
        • Re: Not particularly religious and detest censorship but Spartacus 03:38:40 16/02/01 (0)
  • Bad Taste Find a better Handle 20:49:35 15/02/01 (0)
  • Re: Inaddmissable Proof Spelling Deputy 18:45:49 15/02/01 (3)
    • Re: Inaddmissable Proof Judy Judy 18:48:04 15/02/01 (2)
      • Re: Inaddmissable Proof ... 18:59:34 15/02/01 (1)
        • Re: Inaddmissable Proof Judge Judy 19:01:33 15/02/01 (0)

Post a Followup