[ Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]

Re: Budget 2000 Low earners shafted again !

From: Mike
Time: 7:23:05 PM
Date: 12/2/99

Comments

1) Point taken 2) I hope youre right 3) Provided the "women" are going into the workforce voluntairly maybe but If they do feel theyve no alternative well I think It smaks of racisim for the Govt to deny forigeners jobs that they want in favour of forcing "Nationals" into jobs when theyd rather work in the home 4) I never suggested the should Im only saying the measures are probably not going to work anyway because for most people the extra costs involved in taking up a job wont be covered by the tax benefits 5) the current situation is that non-married couples are discriminated against by the tax, social-welfare, pension, health insurance and various other pieces of legislation. The anomoly you were refering to was reversed several years ago following a Supreme court case. 6 - 7) If youre correct in your faith in the government to always comply with the constitution and EU law Why do we have a Supreme court or European Court. The reason that these bodies have been established because nobody, even (especially) the government plays by the rules all the time.


Message posted to Castlebar Bulletin Board. Views expressed are the responsibiity of the person posting the message.